Articles in the TrendMD network enjoy an enduring citation increase over 36 months, according to a recent follow-up study

The Challenge of Increasing Article Citations

‍

TrendMD's efficient dissemination of scholarly research fills that void. We've demonstrated it with a prior randomized controlled trial, and today we'll discuss the 36-month follow-up results of that trial.

In a prior randomized controlled trial published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, we showed that articles disseminated by our cross-publisher distribution platform saw a 50% increase in citations relative to the control after 12 months. We compared the citation rates in both groups after 36 months as a follow-up. This follow-up research is published in JMIR.

Mean citations over 12 months: TrendMD versus control

‍

TrendMD’s Long-Term Impact on Citation Rates

‍

We found that articles disseminated in the TrendMD network maintained a citation advantage after 36 months. Articles randomized to TrendMD showed a 28% increase in mean citations relative to the control.

Here's how we determined that figure. We block-randomized 3,200 published articles in 64 peer-reviewed journals across eight subject areas. The articles were randomly assigned at the subject level to either the TrendMD group (n=1600) or the study's control group (n=1600). Articles were promoted in the TrendMD Network for six months. We compared the citation rates in both groups after 36 months.

‍

‍

As we explained, articles randomized to TrendMD showed a 28% increase in mean citations relative to the control. The difference in mean citations at 36 months for articles randomized to TrendMD versus the control was 10.52 (95% CI 3.79-17.25) and was statistically significant (P=.001).

Mean citations over 36 months: TrendMD versus control

‍

36-Month Follow-Up: TrendMD vs. Control Group

‍

“TrendMD is an efficient digital tool for knowledge translation and dissemination to targeted audiences to facilitate the uptake of research,” our follow-up article concludes. You can read the full article here.

[1] Van Noorden R. The science that's never been cited. Nature 2017 Dec 14;552(7684):162-164. [CrossRef] [Medline]

[2] Chu JSG, Evans JA. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021 Oct 12;118(41):e2021636118 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]